Part 4: Importance of Companionship and Interaction

An apple falls from a tree and lands softly into the grass; an imprint is left where the apple fell. This could serve readily as an example of how important it is to consistently commune with one's surroundings.

 Now a person will ask "Why is this so?" While a human will ask "Why isn't this not so?" And the blind will ask "Why am I even bothering with this?". Indeed these are all valid questions with nearly certain answers.

 Let me begin with a simple explanation of each:

 Why is it so? Because gravity acts on physical matter and as a result of plant matter breaking at the stem from an external factor, the apple fell to the ground and was cushioned by another soft matter, the grass/soil.

 2. Why is this not so? it depends on your perception of what is or is not there. So while some may see this as an example of how we should interact with our natural surroundings without fear to others it is nothing more than an apple falling from a tree.

 3. Why are you even bothering with this? Because you resonated to it, whether you understand why or not is irrelevant. In fact all beings resonant this knowledge they simply have forgotten how to discover it again. No I am not saying everyone knows everything inheritly. This is a rather big deception that is leading to an overinflated ego mind within many new age circles. In my personal opinion, no one knows everything as everything is consistently changing and being created anew HOWEVER..I do believe everyone does have the potential to learn of these types of knowledge. So while everyone may not already be capable of knowing it all they still have the potential to learn much.

 So what does this all have to do with anything? Well let us examine why I used an apple falling from a tree.

 Symbology:

 The tree is the foundation of life (a society, family, spiritual connection, etc.), The apple/fruit is each individual within that foundation factor that supports them, when something acts on the tree and thus the fruit (individual) it sometimes must descend onto the ground as part of a natural process. It becomes caught by the soil and grass beneath. The question is "Will you leave an imprint? Or will the wind carry you down and away from foundation and grassy soil entirely until you rot?" That is up to the things that be within your life that you consistently connect to but even if this is so, all paths taken lead to eventual evolution. Life does not create failure, simply trial and error before pre-given success.

 If you want to look at it from a more detailed perspective.

 Tree: Cosmos/Foundation of existence

 Apple/Fruit: Consciousness/Life in general

 Falling to the ground (earth/grass): Becoming aware or existent within densities of life (3rd dimension)

 The Imprint under the apple/fruit: The creations left by another creation.

 So our conclusion? Well quite simply, all is connected, treat those around you as you'd treat yourself for they are interlaced into your reality as long as 3D reality is in its current state.

As for the apple and the tree? Keep it in mind, after all, such a simple process led to one major imprint on science, the concept of gravity.

Part 3: You are what you experience

Our daily lives can be labeled by society as simple groups of people living together in the same structure that goes by the same laws. This is a good ideal on paper but nothing more; in fact this is by far one of the most ridiculous ideas I have ever pondered in my existence.

How in the world can an entire species be assumed to be governed by the same laws at any given time? When a species is perhaps more hive minded such as ants or bees it is easy to see that they all tend to lean in the same direction no matter how diverse. With human beings who may all be limited by some aspects of a physical body still retain complete individual potential in reaction to their environment.

This is a FACT that is rooted evidently in nature as a human brain is still being discovered for what it truly is. I believe that the only reason every human being tends to easily be put in one category or another that is, assuming the same laws govern each diverse race of humans is ever present, is due to an assumption that everyone uses only a fraction of their mind. Humanity is being judged by a FRACTION of the full potential that is inherit in every human being.

 Is that right? To assume that absolute laws exist to define how a person will behave or exist within the physical world? Some may scoff at these questions and respond with "Well of course it is right" and my response "Oh how is this so?". There is no such thing as "absolutes" when it comes to assumed authority, to believe such is to go against what it means to be human. But wait, there is a belief held that some sort of absolute law governs everything in our society! Why? Because people reinforce the belief with their actions.

 If the braincell is a mirror of the shape of the universe, is it not possible our thoughts fuel some sort of internal universe for ourselves? If thoughts send out energy and that energy is an extension of our actions, then that would therefore mean that on a cellular level, the way we interact with our environment is based on what we think. This technically means A BEING IS WHAT IT THINKS ABOUT. What information goes through the neurons is the building blocks to personality and a sort of "internal" universe. If a person is constantly living in fear or anger they are therefore a part of an angry world on the external level as well!

Experiences shape personality, is this why so many repetitive dogmas are thrown onto society today? Is this some sort of attempt getting many innocent minds into the same cruel reality? I would certainly hope not as this means that the thing running the world is not truly government or even men at all; it is pure thought.


Before I leave on this note however I must say, these are merely my own laws that I perceive within the universe in reaction to myself; by no means does your world have to follow the same, they are only meant to inspire thinking.

Part 2: Why anger solves nothing while revealing everything

Anger can be defined as a fire after a campfire has long since been extinguished. There is a very peculiar state of mind associated with rage; that being, an animalistic one. When a being becomes enraged what happens to self? Where does the concept of "self" go? It vanishes instantly without any knowledge to the being in question. "Self" is often defined as being 'personality' by the human being while self in the animal kingdom is simply "survival traits". This is not to say animals do not have a personality but they keep it separate from their "self". The R-complex or rather, the lizard mind, does not compute self when infuriated. Instead it computes "ME" not "WHAT IS ME?" but rather "ME ME ME, I *This* I *that*. The term "you" becomes non-existent in instances of anger.

How is this accomplished and why? The R-Complex is associated with survival; when a person feels anger, it is usually due to something threatening their lifestyle or at least making it uncomfortable. A train can only run so smoothly until a rock is put on its tracks to put it poetically. Therefore when some sort of assumed discomfort is brought into a beings existence either due to another or due to their NON-ACCEPTANCE of another beings choices there is brought the emotion anger. Anger can be caused by multiple things however, these are a few key ones:

 -Discomfort towards limitations put on self-survival (lack of food, resources, materialism in raw form)

-Discomfort towards injustices in other emotional endeavors (Dating, sex, so on)

 -Discomfort towards another beings personal "self" (As in, another person does something that doesn't agree with what another person has accumulated and assumed to be "true" in their own lives. Or another being does something that is viewed as "unfair" towards the selfish "ME" robot that is the R-Complex. All beings have the right to opinion and choice and to go against another being for simply doing what they believe is right would be saying that you basically wish those same rights were removed from yourself. Due to the lizard mind's inability to reason outside of "self" 99.9% of the time there is seperation from the respectful "self" which then becomes the "ME". The human "Self" acknowledges others in the same way they acknowledge others in return, but when "self" is replaced with "The Me" notion, there is a loss of self for material.

 So then anger is a result of assumed injustice based on pre-conceived opinion? In a good summary yes it is. But then why do some people get angry just "because". It is because they "believe" there is a reason to be based on past notions, and if they have no knowledge of a situation but infuriate themselves regardless it is because they refuse to believe there is anything "correct" going on when a situation becomes too vastly different for themselves to readily accomadate to. This lack of understanding is a result of a lack of personal forgiveness and thus the forgiveness of others, is also lacking.

 The best cure for the useless emotion of anger? Accept its existence as a part of human existence, but treat it like you'd treat a screaming child, with patience, tolerance, and not letting anything the "angry brain" says be taken seriously, for it is just a phase that may serve no use, it is still natural, and therefore can be adapted to.