Man has five limbs, two arms, two legs, and a head which contains the mind. Each limb can be seen to correspond to an element. Whether you follow the traditions of western or eastern philosophy, 5 elements are indeed present, not only four but instead five.
Western Philosophy:
Earth, Air, Fire, Water, and Spirit
Eastern Philosophy:
Wood, Earth, Water, Fire, and Metal
Look at this image and see if you can decipher which limb goes with which element:
Any ideas? The right arm is electric and thus corresponds to the element of fire, the left arm and hand are magnetic and correspond to the element of water. This same fact can be attributed to many of the organs in the body, the left and right lungs, the kidneys, etc. The feet are associated with the root chakra and thus the elements of earth. The bone structure in the body as well as the nervous system which conducts electric signals would logically be represented by the metal element, metal is firm like bones, and conducts electricity.
This can only leave the head as the divine element of spirit, the realm where left and right, electric and magnetic, fire and water, fuse into one whole circuit. The element of spirit can go any way that it is directed depending on the consciousness that sends out his will. The body is literally a beacon for external stimuli, all of creation is the art gallery of God. If God is the artist, and the art is the information and realities we experience, then not only our our bodies and mind also a work of divine art, but we are beacons of that divine creator itself.
When a psychedelic experience, a dream, or some other spiritual phenomenon is undergone, this is not simply a creation or extension of the mind within itself, it is a literal extension of the self creating a tribute to the creator force that has created that mind. Our neurons create an internal universe based on the external artwork of God (the universe).
Therefore if we begin to work with our own universe and bring it outward to join the external universe, this is a divine union of matter and energy in physical form. We can fuse mortality and godhood, man and god, the concept of a cosmic creator does NOT need to be seen religiously, for our mental workings, when in a focused state are a reflection of the processes of God.
Humanity itself was not programmed to be God, otherwise there would be no universe left. Humanity IS however a piece of cosmic art that has the capability of staying in the best of the creator's gallery, all humanity must do, is keep itself from falling apart. This is done by acceptance of the self as being an extension of divinity and not extension of will alone; this can only be done when acceptance of human flaw in all aspects is cherished as a trial and not a weakness.
What happens when humanity cannot first accept itself? It latches onto materialism and ideology of self determined reality even though every action is done towards the exact opposite of such a goal. To become godly man and woman must first reach back into nature and discover what was lost; paradise on earth.
Search This Blog
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Part 4: Importance of Companionship and Interaction
An apple falls from a tree and lands softly into the grass; an imprint is left where the apple fell. This could serve readily as an example of how important it is to consistently commune with one's surroundings.
Now a person will ask "Why is this so?" While a human will ask "Why isn't this not so?" And the blind will ask "Why am I even bothering with this?". Indeed these are all valid questions with nearly certain answers.
Let me begin with a simple explanation of each:
Why is it so? Because gravity acts on physical matter and as a result of plant matter breaking at the stem from an external factor, the apple fell to the ground and was cushioned by another soft matter, the grass/soil.
2. Why is this not so? it depends on your perception of what is or is not there. So while some may see this as an example of how we should interact with our natural surroundings without fear to others it is nothing more than an apple falling from a tree.
3. Why are you even bothering with this? Because you resonated to it, whether you understand why or not is irrelevant. In fact all beings resonant this knowledge they simply have forgotten how to discover it again. No I am not saying everyone knows everything inheritly. This is a rather big deception that is leading to an overinflated ego mind within many new age circles. In my personal opinion, no one knows everything as everything is consistently changing and being created anew HOWEVER..I do believe everyone does have the potential to learn of these types of knowledge. So while everyone may not already be capable of knowing it all they still have the potential to learn much.
So what does this all have to do with anything? Well let us examine why I used an apple falling from a tree.
Symbology:
The tree is the foundation of life (a society, family, spiritual connection, etc.), The apple/fruit is each individual within that foundation factor that supports them, when something acts on the tree and thus the fruit (individual) it sometimes must descend onto the ground as part of a natural process. It becomes caught by the soil and grass beneath. The question is "Will you leave an imprint? Or will the wind carry you down and away from foundation and grassy soil entirely until you rot?" That is up to the things that be within your life that you consistently connect to but even if this is so, all paths taken lead to eventual evolution. Life does not create failure, simply trial and error before pre-given success.
If you want to look at it from a more detailed perspective.
Tree: Cosmos/Foundation of existence
Apple/Fruit: Consciousness/Life in general
Falling to the ground (earth/grass): Becoming aware or existent within densities of life (3rd dimension)
The Imprint under the apple/fruit: The creations left by another creation.
So our conclusion? Well quite simply, all is connected, treat those around you as you'd treat yourself for they are interlaced into your reality as long as 3D reality is in its current state.
As for the apple and the tree? Keep it in mind, after all, such a simple process led to one major imprint on science, the concept of gravity.
Now a person will ask "Why is this so?" While a human will ask "Why isn't this not so?" And the blind will ask "Why am I even bothering with this?". Indeed these are all valid questions with nearly certain answers.
Let me begin with a simple explanation of each:
Why is it so? Because gravity acts on physical matter and as a result of plant matter breaking at the stem from an external factor, the apple fell to the ground and was cushioned by another soft matter, the grass/soil.
2. Why is this not so? it depends on your perception of what is or is not there. So while some may see this as an example of how we should interact with our natural surroundings without fear to others it is nothing more than an apple falling from a tree.
3. Why are you even bothering with this? Because you resonated to it, whether you understand why or not is irrelevant. In fact all beings resonant this knowledge they simply have forgotten how to discover it again. No I am not saying everyone knows everything inheritly. This is a rather big deception that is leading to an overinflated ego mind within many new age circles. In my personal opinion, no one knows everything as everything is consistently changing and being created anew HOWEVER..I do believe everyone does have the potential to learn of these types of knowledge. So while everyone may not already be capable of knowing it all they still have the potential to learn much.
So what does this all have to do with anything? Well let us examine why I used an apple falling from a tree.
Symbology:
The tree is the foundation of life (a society, family, spiritual connection, etc.), The apple/fruit is each individual within that foundation factor that supports them, when something acts on the tree and thus the fruit (individual) it sometimes must descend onto the ground as part of a natural process. It becomes caught by the soil and grass beneath. The question is "Will you leave an imprint? Or will the wind carry you down and away from foundation and grassy soil entirely until you rot?" That is up to the things that be within your life that you consistently connect to but even if this is so, all paths taken lead to eventual evolution. Life does not create failure, simply trial and error before pre-given success.
If you want to look at it from a more detailed perspective.
Tree: Cosmos/Foundation of existence
Apple/Fruit: Consciousness/Life in general
Falling to the ground (earth/grass): Becoming aware or existent within densities of life (3rd dimension)
The Imprint under the apple/fruit: The creations left by another creation.
So our conclusion? Well quite simply, all is connected, treat those around you as you'd treat yourself for they are interlaced into your reality as long as 3D reality is in its current state.
As for the apple and the tree? Keep it in mind, after all, such a simple process led to one major imprint on science, the concept of gravity.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Part 3: You are what you experience
Our daily lives can be labeled by society as simple groups of people living together in the same structure that goes by the same laws. This is a good ideal on paper but nothing more; in fact this is by far one of the most ridiculous ideas I have ever pondered in my existence.
How in the world can an entire species be assumed to be governed by the same laws at any given time? When a species is perhaps more hive minded such as ants or bees it is easy to see that they all tend to lean in the same direction no matter how diverse. With human beings who may all be limited by some aspects of a physical body still retain complete individual potential in reaction to their environment.
This is a FACT that is rooted evidently in nature as a human brain is still being discovered for what it truly is. I believe that the only reason every human being tends to easily be put in one category or another that is, assuming the same laws govern each diverse race of humans is ever present, is due to an assumption that everyone uses only a fraction of their mind. Humanity is being judged by a FRACTION of the full potential that is inherit in every human being.
Is that right? To assume that absolute laws exist to define how a person will behave or exist within the physical world? Some may scoff at these questions and respond with "Well of course it is right" and my response "Oh how is this so?". There is no such thing as "absolutes" when it comes to assumed authority, to believe such is to go against what it means to be human. But wait, there is a belief held that some sort of absolute law governs everything in our society! Why? Because people reinforce the belief with their actions.
If the braincell is a mirror of the shape of the universe, is it not possible our thoughts fuel some sort of internal universe for ourselves? If thoughts send out energy and that energy is an extension of our actions, then that would therefore mean that on a cellular level, the way we interact with our environment is based on what we think. This technically means A BEING IS WHAT IT THINKS ABOUT. What information goes through the neurons is the building blocks to personality and a sort of "internal" universe. If a person is constantly living in fear or anger they are therefore a part of an angry world on the external level as well!
Experiences shape personality, is this why so many repetitive dogmas are thrown onto society today? Is this some sort of attempt getting many innocent minds into the same cruel reality? I would certainly hope not as this means that the thing running the world is not truly government or even men at all; it is pure thought.
Before I leave on this note however I must say, these are merely my own laws that I perceive within the universe in reaction to myself; by no means does your world have to follow the same, they are only meant to inspire thinking.
How in the world can an entire species be assumed to be governed by the same laws at any given time? When a species is perhaps more hive minded such as ants or bees it is easy to see that they all tend to lean in the same direction no matter how diverse. With human beings who may all be limited by some aspects of a physical body still retain complete individual potential in reaction to their environment.
This is a FACT that is rooted evidently in nature as a human brain is still being discovered for what it truly is. I believe that the only reason every human being tends to easily be put in one category or another that is, assuming the same laws govern each diverse race of humans is ever present, is due to an assumption that everyone uses only a fraction of their mind. Humanity is being judged by a FRACTION of the full potential that is inherit in every human being.
Is that right? To assume that absolute laws exist to define how a person will behave or exist within the physical world? Some may scoff at these questions and respond with "Well of course it is right" and my response "Oh how is this so?". There is no such thing as "absolutes" when it comes to assumed authority, to believe such is to go against what it means to be human. But wait, there is a belief held that some sort of absolute law governs everything in our society! Why? Because people reinforce the belief with their actions.
If the braincell is a mirror of the shape of the universe, is it not possible our thoughts fuel some sort of internal universe for ourselves? If thoughts send out energy and that energy is an extension of our actions, then that would therefore mean that on a cellular level, the way we interact with our environment is based on what we think. This technically means A BEING IS WHAT IT THINKS ABOUT. What information goes through the neurons is the building blocks to personality and a sort of "internal" universe. If a person is constantly living in fear or anger they are therefore a part of an angry world on the external level as well!
Experiences shape personality, is this why so many repetitive dogmas are thrown onto society today? Is this some sort of attempt getting many innocent minds into the same cruel reality? I would certainly hope not as this means that the thing running the world is not truly government or even men at all; it is pure thought.
Before I leave on this note however I must say, these are merely my own laws that I perceive within the universe in reaction to myself; by no means does your world have to follow the same, they are only meant to inspire thinking.
Part 2: Why anger solves nothing while revealing everything
Anger can be defined as a fire after a campfire has long since been extinguished. There is a very peculiar state of mind associated with rage; that being, an animalistic one. When a being becomes enraged what happens to self? Where does the concept of "self" go? It vanishes instantly without any knowledge to the being in question. "Self" is often defined as being 'personality' by the human being while self in the animal kingdom is simply "survival traits". This is not to say animals do not have a personality but they keep it separate from their "self". The R-complex or rather, the lizard mind, does not compute self when infuriated. Instead it computes "ME" not "WHAT IS ME?" but rather "ME ME ME, I *This* I *that*. The term "you" becomes non-existent in instances of anger.
How is this accomplished and why? The R-Complex is associated with survival; when a person feels anger, it is usually due to something threatening their lifestyle or at least making it uncomfortable. A train can only run so smoothly until a rock is put on its tracks to put it poetically. Therefore when some sort of assumed discomfort is brought into a beings existence either due to another or due to their NON-ACCEPTANCE of another beings choices there is brought the emotion anger. Anger can be caused by multiple things however, these are a few key ones:
-Discomfort towards limitations put on self-survival (lack of food, resources, materialism in raw form)
-Discomfort towards injustices in other emotional endeavors (Dating, sex, so on)
-Discomfort towards another beings personal "self" (As in, another person does something that doesn't agree with what another person has accumulated and assumed to be "true" in their own lives. Or another being does something that is viewed as "unfair" towards the selfish "ME" robot that is the R-Complex. All beings have the right to opinion and choice and to go against another being for simply doing what they believe is right would be saying that you basically wish those same rights were removed from yourself. Due to the lizard mind's inability to reason outside of "self" 99.9% of the time there is seperation from the respectful "self" which then becomes the "ME". The human "Self" acknowledges others in the same way they acknowledge others in return, but when "self" is replaced with "The Me" notion, there is a loss of self for material.
So then anger is a result of assumed injustice based on pre-conceived opinion? In a good summary yes it is. But then why do some people get angry just "because". It is because they "believe" there is a reason to be based on past notions, and if they have no knowledge of a situation but infuriate themselves regardless it is because they refuse to believe there is anything "correct" going on when a situation becomes too vastly different for themselves to readily accomadate to. This lack of understanding is a result of a lack of personal forgiveness and thus the forgiveness of others, is also lacking.
The best cure for the useless emotion of anger? Accept its existence as a part of human existence, but treat it like you'd treat a screaming child, with patience, tolerance, and not letting anything the "angry brain" says be taken seriously, for it is just a phase that may serve no use, it is still natural, and therefore can be adapted to.
How is this accomplished and why? The R-Complex is associated with survival; when a person feels anger, it is usually due to something threatening their lifestyle or at least making it uncomfortable. A train can only run so smoothly until a rock is put on its tracks to put it poetically. Therefore when some sort of assumed discomfort is brought into a beings existence either due to another or due to their NON-ACCEPTANCE of another beings choices there is brought the emotion anger. Anger can be caused by multiple things however, these are a few key ones:
-Discomfort towards limitations put on self-survival (lack of food, resources, materialism in raw form)
-Discomfort towards injustices in other emotional endeavors (Dating, sex, so on)
-Discomfort towards another beings personal "self" (As in, another person does something that doesn't agree with what another person has accumulated and assumed to be "true" in their own lives. Or another being does something that is viewed as "unfair" towards the selfish "ME" robot that is the R-Complex. All beings have the right to opinion and choice and to go against another being for simply doing what they believe is right would be saying that you basically wish those same rights were removed from yourself. Due to the lizard mind's inability to reason outside of "self" 99.9% of the time there is seperation from the respectful "self" which then becomes the "ME". The human "Self" acknowledges others in the same way they acknowledge others in return, but when "self" is replaced with "The Me" notion, there is a loss of self for material.
So then anger is a result of assumed injustice based on pre-conceived opinion? In a good summary yes it is. But then why do some people get angry just "because". It is because they "believe" there is a reason to be based on past notions, and if they have no knowledge of a situation but infuriate themselves regardless it is because they refuse to believe there is anything "correct" going on when a situation becomes too vastly different for themselves to readily accomadate to. This lack of understanding is a result of a lack of personal forgiveness and thus the forgiveness of others, is also lacking.
The best cure for the useless emotion of anger? Accept its existence as a part of human existence, but treat it like you'd treat a screaming child, with patience, tolerance, and not letting anything the "angry brain" says be taken seriously, for it is just a phase that may serve no use, it is still natural, and therefore can be adapted to.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Part 1: Basics of Emotional Interaction
A human being, by programmed nature, is capable of experiencing a variety of emotions, thoughts, and feelings towards others. One may ask "Are these things not all the same"? Indeed they are not.
Let us begin by examining how a typical person interacts with others on a daily basis. To begin with, if encountering a stranger who is NOT in the immediate path towards a desired destination there is little or no communication on any level. If however the stranger crosses paths with the person we are imagining then one of two things will have a 95% chance of happening; either the man will say "excuse me" to the stranger or the stranger will be the one to state that apology first.
Why is this? Why retain mannerisms for people we do not know? Nothing says that stranger hasn't wronged someone we know, nothing says the stranger isn't a well thinking person either. Is this the reason for mannerisms? Because the person "might" be a good person? Or is it the hope that such a person will respect us for being polite? I feel it cannot be any of these things and to believe so would make a person either completely secure or completely paranoid within their environment and I feel that neither is 100% possible for any human being.
What I do believe on this matter is that internally, there is a conflict between the physical and the emotional. When we are walking we are focusing on the physical aspects of our path but when another being crosses our path the emotional or mental (one of the two, perhaps a bit of both) intervenes to give us good sense towards this other being. This is not so much respect so much as it is responsibility on a humane level. We can have the most frustrating day of our lives but yet we still find time to apologize for intervening in the path of another and others do the same as well in return.
There is thought, it involves thinking that all people, are possibly "good" or "bad" potentially. Thinking however also gets our attention when we need to enter a state of acknowledgement for another being; we may not readily enjoy their presence but we still accept that it must be acknowledged as it is in our immediate environment and thus possibly relevant to ourselves.
Then we have Emotion. Emotion involves a curious "feel" for other things in our environment. This is what helps us judge whether or not a being should be treated a certain way based on external stimuli. If a person we do not know crosses our path, we feel neutral towards the person mentally but the respect we suddenly gain is a slight burst of "hopeful compassion" that is usually unnoticed as such. If this was not the case then we would probably disregard the person in our line of sight completely until we stumbled over there as if they were invisible.
We also have feelings, feelings are the after result of the situations we face involving other beings. If a stranger apologizes for getting in our way and says "Excuse me" we usually say "You're ok, or oh its fine". Why is this? Is this just a typical response? It cannot be, the human is a being of natural compassion, so much that it is unnoticed. If a person apologizes to us for getting in our way, we feel torn and slightly upset with ourselves, perhaps embarassed for getting in the way of another even though the other clearly is apologizing for getting in our path. In turn we say "Its ok" as if we are trying to assure the person that what they are doing is not bothersome to us, just out of reflex.
So then is this mental/emotional reflex natural? It must be for I see it almost everyday. "Excuse Me", "You're ok", "Pardon Me" "Oh don't worry", "Am I in your way?" "No don't worry, you can go ahead". See what I mean? These are not words of people that are paranoid or completely confident, these are words of beings that are carefully compassionate. Human beings respect one another so much that they cannot even see just how much they truly respect each other. Isn't that a fascinating revelation?
Why else would such events occur daily? When people are forced into close proximity suddenly there is a need to respect thy neighbor even if both beings are complete opposites to one another. There is a need to respect in close proximity, I find this interesting given how divided people attempt to be on a daily basis. Perhaps the key to humanity understanding itself isn't to divide them individually.
Instead if human beings were put closer together towards something they all perceive as individual to themselves, and when the time comes there will be a great chorus of "Excuse me, sorry pardon me, am I in your way?" and in return there will be heard a gentle "Oh don't worry you're fine, you can go ahead first." That of course can only be followed by one more phrase that is universal, a soft spoken "Thank you".
Let us begin by examining how a typical person interacts with others on a daily basis. To begin with, if encountering a stranger who is NOT in the immediate path towards a desired destination there is little or no communication on any level. If however the stranger crosses paths with the person we are imagining then one of two things will have a 95% chance of happening; either the man will say "excuse me" to the stranger or the stranger will be the one to state that apology first.
Why is this? Why retain mannerisms for people we do not know? Nothing says that stranger hasn't wronged someone we know, nothing says the stranger isn't a well thinking person either. Is this the reason for mannerisms? Because the person "might" be a good person? Or is it the hope that such a person will respect us for being polite? I feel it cannot be any of these things and to believe so would make a person either completely secure or completely paranoid within their environment and I feel that neither is 100% possible for any human being.
What I do believe on this matter is that internally, there is a conflict between the physical and the emotional. When we are walking we are focusing on the physical aspects of our path but when another being crosses our path the emotional or mental (one of the two, perhaps a bit of both) intervenes to give us good sense towards this other being. This is not so much respect so much as it is responsibility on a humane level. We can have the most frustrating day of our lives but yet we still find time to apologize for intervening in the path of another and others do the same as well in return.
There is thought, it involves thinking that all people, are possibly "good" or "bad" potentially. Thinking however also gets our attention when we need to enter a state of acknowledgement for another being; we may not readily enjoy their presence but we still accept that it must be acknowledged as it is in our immediate environment and thus possibly relevant to ourselves.
Then we have Emotion. Emotion involves a curious "feel" for other things in our environment. This is what helps us judge whether or not a being should be treated a certain way based on external stimuli. If a person we do not know crosses our path, we feel neutral towards the person mentally but the respect we suddenly gain is a slight burst of "hopeful compassion" that is usually unnoticed as such. If this was not the case then we would probably disregard the person in our line of sight completely until we stumbled over there as if they were invisible.
We also have feelings, feelings are the after result of the situations we face involving other beings. If a stranger apologizes for getting in our way and says "Excuse me" we usually say "You're ok, or oh its fine". Why is this? Is this just a typical response? It cannot be, the human is a being of natural compassion, so much that it is unnoticed. If a person apologizes to us for getting in our way, we feel torn and slightly upset with ourselves, perhaps embarassed for getting in the way of another even though the other clearly is apologizing for getting in our path. In turn we say "Its ok" as if we are trying to assure the person that what they are doing is not bothersome to us, just out of reflex.
So then is this mental/emotional reflex natural? It must be for I see it almost everyday. "Excuse Me", "You're ok", "Pardon Me" "Oh don't worry", "Am I in your way?" "No don't worry, you can go ahead". See what I mean? These are not words of people that are paranoid or completely confident, these are words of beings that are carefully compassionate. Human beings respect one another so much that they cannot even see just how much they truly respect each other. Isn't that a fascinating revelation?
Why else would such events occur daily? When people are forced into close proximity suddenly there is a need to respect thy neighbor even if both beings are complete opposites to one another. There is a need to respect in close proximity, I find this interesting given how divided people attempt to be on a daily basis. Perhaps the key to humanity understanding itself isn't to divide them individually.
Instead if human beings were put closer together towards something they all perceive as individual to themselves, and when the time comes there will be a great chorus of "Excuse me, sorry pardon me, am I in your way?" and in return there will be heard a gentle "Oh don't worry you're fine, you can go ahead first." That of course can only be followed by one more phrase that is universal, a soft spoken "Thank you".
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Part 0: What is Birth?
A seed is engrained into dirt, the dirt overcomes the seed, the dirt is watered, warmed, and given air to breathe.
The seed grows and sheds roots (the limbs) outward, still encased mostly in a shell, the physical body. When cared for enough, under the right conditions, the seed developes into a mostly living entity. The roots extend into the ground and connect to the deeper frequencies of the earth. This is the plant equivelent of the human legs becoming developed and attuning to the root energy centers in the lower body; allowing prolonged physical activities and connection to nature.
The seed, now becomes a plant, the plant is still however a limited being. It may flower, it may grow beautiful even, but what good is it without the necessities that are water and light? Water is the cleansing element of renewal and is needed when connecting to the fiery light energy that burns internally during a release of life force. The sunlight that is external is also needed to help the body, the limited plant or seed (the human form) remember its origin as a being of energy.
The energy is the beginning of all life, the farthest memory distant in thought from all other thoughts. The human memory is beyond flesh it extends in biology. Just as every seed KNOWS it needs to be fed light and soil and water and air, the human mind, deep within its crevices, perhaps even unknown to the conscious 3D mind, knows that it needs connection to the external and internal faces of the cosmos.
The cosmos is the divine light, shining on all things, the water is the spirit, ever changing in a brief moment, the air is the thought and choice that leads to discovering the origin of existence within the mind, and the fire? The fire is hidden but ever present in making the body function physically.
What is birth? The result of a being uncovering not why it exists but why it exists so dynamically within the carefully constructed gardens of creation and acceptance of those conditions as a necessity. That is birth on the deepest level, birth is physical to some, but true birth does not come within the human existence until it reaches a state of self acceptance, forgiveness, and selfless bliss, combined with connection to all as opposed to the simple "I" of the 3D sapient mind.
The seed grows and sheds roots (the limbs) outward, still encased mostly in a shell, the physical body. When cared for enough, under the right conditions, the seed developes into a mostly living entity. The roots extend into the ground and connect to the deeper frequencies of the earth. This is the plant equivelent of the human legs becoming developed and attuning to the root energy centers in the lower body; allowing prolonged physical activities and connection to nature.
The seed, now becomes a plant, the plant is still however a limited being. It may flower, it may grow beautiful even, but what good is it without the necessities that are water and light? Water is the cleansing element of renewal and is needed when connecting to the fiery light energy that burns internally during a release of life force. The sunlight that is external is also needed to help the body, the limited plant or seed (the human form) remember its origin as a being of energy.
The energy is the beginning of all life, the farthest memory distant in thought from all other thoughts. The human memory is beyond flesh it extends in biology. Just as every seed KNOWS it needs to be fed light and soil and water and air, the human mind, deep within its crevices, perhaps even unknown to the conscious 3D mind, knows that it needs connection to the external and internal faces of the cosmos.
The cosmos is the divine light, shining on all things, the water is the spirit, ever changing in a brief moment, the air is the thought and choice that leads to discovering the origin of existence within the mind, and the fire? The fire is hidden but ever present in making the body function physically.
What is birth? The result of a being uncovering not why it exists but why it exists so dynamically within the carefully constructed gardens of creation and acceptance of those conditions as a necessity. That is birth on the deepest level, birth is physical to some, but true birth does not come within the human existence until it reaches a state of self acceptance, forgiveness, and selfless bliss, combined with connection to all as opposed to the simple "I" of the 3D sapient mind.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)