Part 7: The 7 not so deadly sins of nature

Upon reading the title you may ponder how possibly things such as wrath and greed are non-lethal to the well being of a society as a whole or perhaps even just to a person in general. Let us look at this in a very quick and to the point way as I do not desire to go into the history of the deadly sins.

First and foremost, Christianity created sin. With this in mind it is up to the individual to determine what is deadly and what is not. But wait, on that note the people who are not christian still hold values don't they? Well, don't they? In fact they do not hold any values outside of what is pressured the entire life of a typical person.

Keep in mind most laws and ideas spread throughout the years of schooling and careers are usually based on the religious dominance in that area. Why are there few if any buddhist points being taught in school or in the workplace? Would it not benefit society as a whole more if everyone accepted one another and only followed what was comfortable to them? Apparently not according to the madmen who spread religious fear faster than they spread the religion itself.

Most people in our society are either christian or atheist, only a good fraction of other people worship differently. When I say christian I speak of ALL people who worship the deity known as the so called allmighty god of heaven. The same god who commands that his followers be his flock of bloodstained sheep; the blood being the result of gentle treachery unto others, as sheep do not kill with strength, they do it with a gentle touch of false beauty.

 Now as for the sins themselves, what are they?

 Lust-Strong feeling of desire for another person or object, can relate to promiscuity or to lust of a habit as a means of reliance. This occurs when the mental is becoming underactive, the emotional is active but imbalanced, and the physical is overactive.

 Anger-A result of disagreement with something or someone else, can result from physical/mental/emotional

 Pride-Feeling overconfident in one's own success or content. Usually results from overactive mind/emotion

 Gluttony/Sloth-Desire to eat more than is naturally expected, to do what is less than expected. This can be seen as an underactive stimulation of the physical and mental.

 Greed-To have or attempt to have more than others in some materialistic way. A result of overactive/imbalanced mental with an underactive emotional state.

 Anger II/Wrath-To desire revenge out of anger or distaste for something. Forms from an underactive emotional a decently active mental, and an overactive energy from the physical.

 Envy-Feeling spite towards another person or situation based on personal desire for what another person may experience. Envy shows up sometimes spontaneously, it is the result of an imbalanced active mind, decently active physical traits, and an overly active imbalanced emotional part of the mind.

 Now at a glance these all sound rather undesirable but if that were indeed so then every normal human being would not perform such actions would they?

 Each sin is natural and essential to human development. While a few things such as promiscuity as well as uncontrolled wrath are rather destructive when not given an effective outlet, they are still natural in that regard. It is natural to be angered, to desire, to want more, and to want nothing as well as to be proud of everything one has.

 These traits are the founding principles of a generic mortal human being, it is the control and balance of these traits that lead a person into godhood. How can it possibly done otherwise unless a mortal experience every one of these? Each has a lesson to teach on the path to self discovery IF that is the desire of the individual, no one has to agree with anything I have mentioned, that is where the will must be seen. If these 7 things are seen as sins then that is the same as stating that wiillpower is a sin.

 The responsibility of expressing the 7 so called sins is dependant on the person's actions; they create their own rules and vows,should those be broken it is based on their choice not on some malevolent force inspiring temptation. By no means are any of these so called sins even noteworthy of anything out of the ordinary, if anything every so called sin is probably experienced by most on a daily basis.


 If we remember the diagram of the 7 main chakras, could we not give an equivelent to each "sin"?


Root Chakra: Lower body, physical traits/activity/-Sloth or Lust

Spleen Chakra: Mid lower body, healing ability/physical activity-Greed or Sloth

Solar Plexus: Central point of the lower body/Creativity/Auric energy-Anger

Heart Chakra: Crossing point of the body/emotions-Lust or Pride

Throat Chakra: Energy output and communication-Envy or Wrath

Third Eye Chakra: Clarity and mental abilities-greed or passive anger

Crown Chakra-Balance of the body, divinity-Any of the sins amplified

Keep in mind each chakra is an energy center, if one is overloaded or underworked it will affect the overall balance of the others. If a person is going to experience the "sins" of nature they should make it a point to create an outlet for such energies, creative or physical. Remember the rules a person has created within their internal mind determine how these actions will react within their environment, if you are bound to a rule you ahve created for your mind but go against it this will create in turn more stress on those chakras and those chakras of those around you.

As a conclusion, find outlets that will serve you as opposed to weaken you, many people write to filter out excess energy or to increase auric flow to underactive energy centers. As far as the dogmas surrounding the sins, they are part of being mortal, conquer and learn to control your nature and you will be as part god, and in time with patience would it not be possible to be a god entirely?

Part 6: Applied Science

We play a game of cards with the nature of the paradox.
In a battle to determine what is possible and what is not.

One solution, for our delusions.

It is so hard to see beyond the small things that we believe.

The well of thoughts is never dry.
Just use a bucket and ideas will come out.

Bookshelves are full with works that have been proven wrong
Things that once were heresies have turned to be the rules.

One solution, for our delusions

It is so hard to see beyond the small things that we believe.

The well of thoughts is never dry, and we are so thirsty.


What does it mean to truly be a person who studies science? What is science?

 Often it is termed to mean "An intelligent person who studies life in some aspect" now that is not an official definition but it it is still accurate is it not? In this case this would make every living breathing person a scientist for studying their own existence or at least the existence of other people. Wouldn't it be nice to see everyone perceive everyone else (including themselves) as a person of scientific study? With a reinforced collective thought of discovering things and learning from them I think it would be safe to awesome or society would be much more intellectual.

 Although often with intellectuality comes boredom, our world would crumble under its own morale if this were to ever happen. Science as it is currently understood by most of our society can only go so far before it is just as lost as the very people who believe that science knows all. Indeed, natural cosmic science may know all as it is everything that indeed is there to be known; but it is the sciences of man that must edited or perhaps the perception of science alone in this case.

Now what about the things that are taboo in the world of science? When a subject such as say "out of body experiences" is brought to the dissection table what is the first response by 98% of scalpels? Naturally the response is "Go elsewhere, I cannot touch you therefore you are not part of science". This, why understandable, is the root of its own misunderstanding. To believe something is not capable of being cut into halves with a simple sharp medical tool is to say the world of spirit is beyond the world of flesh.

The world of spirit is not beyond, it has the potential to be within the world of flesh if it is sought out. Why must subjects that involve the evolution of the psychic mind be dismissed? Science already has discovered that only a fraction of the brain is used in everday life; what of the rest of the brain? Is it simply "empty" space? As for those religiious on the subject I ask "If God made humanity, and therefore the organ that runs his life, why then would he create empty space for such a wonderfully creative and independent thing we call the mind? Why would he not instead be wise and make the mind incapable of free thought?" Oh but wait, christianic ideals have already done this, not by the religion itself but by those teaching it.

 Science must be remembered as rule, NOT choice. Furthermore, science should be seen as something we experience each day, ourselves. We as living beings are part of nature, science is the core of all reality, we must re-define the word science to realize that all existence has always gone by a set of self created rules half the time while the other half of the time the other rules are created by other self created rules in place.

Is it possible there is even a science behind God? Whether God is indeed a creator figure, a cosmic void that began all life, or perhaps an ability within the mind, maybe all life is linked by an invisible force that can only be called God for its greatness. Perhaps all of the previous statements are indeed true, perhaps not. More easy said than done, nature has always been a waiting game. In time I feel a different understanding of both science and God will be brought to our world. But this will not happen in my personal opinion until after humanity has first gained a different understanding of itself.

 Science, Applied Science? Is there such a thing? If one has a belief in it then yes it exists. But if everything is natural, then perhaps nothing is being applied at all, perhaps it is simply shared science within all that is or could become existant. As for the world of spirit humanity must see through their own disbelief and realize that if such a world exists beyond matter or even within matter, that it is still part of science. Mysticism and extravagant ideas of cosmic creators must be brought in as natural and not supernatural, until man can see the mystical as being on the same level as himself he is succeptable to being ruled by fantaticism, the opposing force to evolution.


Science, everlasting science. A magical alliance of reason and result.

Part 5: The Divine Limbs of God

Man has five limbs, two arms, two legs, and a head which contains the mind. Each limb can be seen to correspond to an element. Whether you follow the traditions of western or eastern philosophy, 5 elements are indeed present, not only four but instead five.

 Western Philosophy:

 Earth, Air, Fire, Water, and Spirit

 Eastern Philosophy:

 Wood, Earth, Water, Fire, and Metal


 Look at this image and see if you can decipher which limb goes with which element:

Any ideas? The right arm is electric and thus corresponds to the element of fire, the left arm and hand are magnetic and correspond to the element of water. This same fact can be attributed to many of the organs in the body, the left and right lungs, the kidneys, etc. The feet are associated with the root chakra and thus the elements of earth. The bone structure in the body as well as the nervous system which conducts electric signals would logically be represented by the metal element, metal is firm like bones, and conducts electricity.

 This can only leave the head as the divine element of spirit, the realm where left and right, electric and magnetic, fire and water, fuse into one whole circuit. The element of spirit can go any way that it is directed depending on the consciousness that sends out his will. The body is literally a beacon for external stimuli, all of creation is the art gallery of God. If God is the artist, and the art is the information and realities we experience, then not only our our bodies and mind also a work of divine art, but we are beacons of that divine creator itself.

When a psychedelic experience, a dream, or some other spiritual phenomenon is undergone, this is not simply a creation or extension of the mind within itself, it is a literal extension of the self creating a tribute to the creator force that has created that mind. Our neurons create an internal universe based on the external artwork of God (the universe).

Therefore if we begin to work with our own universe and bring it outward to join the external universe, this is a divine union of matter and energy in physical form. We can fuse mortality and godhood, man and god, the concept of a cosmic creator does NOT need to be seen religiously, for our mental workings, when in a focused state are a reflection of the processes of God.

Humanity itself was not programmed to be God, otherwise there would be no universe left. Humanity IS however a piece of cosmic art that has the capability of staying in the best of the creator's gallery, all humanity must do, is keep itself from falling apart. This is done by acceptance of the self as being an extension of divinity and not extension of will alone; this can only be done when acceptance of human flaw in all aspects is cherished as a trial and not a weakness.

What happens when humanity cannot first accept itself? It latches onto materialism and ideology of self determined reality even though every action is done towards the exact opposite of such a goal. To become godly man and woman must first reach back into nature and discover what was lost; paradise on earth. 

Part 4: Importance of Companionship and Interaction

An apple falls from a tree and lands softly into the grass; an imprint is left where the apple fell. This could serve readily as an example of how important it is to consistently commune with one's surroundings.

 Now a person will ask "Why is this so?" While a human will ask "Why isn't this not so?" And the blind will ask "Why am I even bothering with this?". Indeed these are all valid questions with nearly certain answers.

 Let me begin with a simple explanation of each:

 Why is it so? Because gravity acts on physical matter and as a result of plant matter breaking at the stem from an external factor, the apple fell to the ground and was cushioned by another soft matter, the grass/soil.

 2. Why is this not so? it depends on your perception of what is or is not there. So while some may see this as an example of how we should interact with our natural surroundings without fear to others it is nothing more than an apple falling from a tree.

 3. Why are you even bothering with this? Because you resonated to it, whether you understand why or not is irrelevant. In fact all beings resonant this knowledge they simply have forgotten how to discover it again. No I am not saying everyone knows everything inheritly. This is a rather big deception that is leading to an overinflated ego mind within many new age circles. In my personal opinion, no one knows everything as everything is consistently changing and being created anew HOWEVER..I do believe everyone does have the potential to learn of these types of knowledge. So while everyone may not already be capable of knowing it all they still have the potential to learn much.

 So what does this all have to do with anything? Well let us examine why I used an apple falling from a tree.

 Symbology:

 The tree is the foundation of life (a society, family, spiritual connection, etc.), The apple/fruit is each individual within that foundation factor that supports them, when something acts on the tree and thus the fruit (individual) it sometimes must descend onto the ground as part of a natural process. It becomes caught by the soil and grass beneath. The question is "Will you leave an imprint? Or will the wind carry you down and away from foundation and grassy soil entirely until you rot?" That is up to the things that be within your life that you consistently connect to but even if this is so, all paths taken lead to eventual evolution. Life does not create failure, simply trial and error before pre-given success.

 If you want to look at it from a more detailed perspective.

 Tree: Cosmos/Foundation of existence

 Apple/Fruit: Consciousness/Life in general

 Falling to the ground (earth/grass): Becoming aware or existent within densities of life (3rd dimension)

 The Imprint under the apple/fruit: The creations left by another creation.

 So our conclusion? Well quite simply, all is connected, treat those around you as you'd treat yourself for they are interlaced into your reality as long as 3D reality is in its current state.

As for the apple and the tree? Keep it in mind, after all, such a simple process led to one major imprint on science, the concept of gravity.

Part 3: You are what you experience

Our daily lives can be labeled by society as simple groups of people living together in the same structure that goes by the same laws. This is a good ideal on paper but nothing more; in fact this is by far one of the most ridiculous ideas I have ever pondered in my existence.

How in the world can an entire species be assumed to be governed by the same laws at any given time? When a species is perhaps more hive minded such as ants or bees it is easy to see that they all tend to lean in the same direction no matter how diverse. With human beings who may all be limited by some aspects of a physical body still retain complete individual potential in reaction to their environment.

This is a FACT that is rooted evidently in nature as a human brain is still being discovered for what it truly is. I believe that the only reason every human being tends to easily be put in one category or another that is, assuming the same laws govern each diverse race of humans is ever present, is due to an assumption that everyone uses only a fraction of their mind. Humanity is being judged by a FRACTION of the full potential that is inherit in every human being.

 Is that right? To assume that absolute laws exist to define how a person will behave or exist within the physical world? Some may scoff at these questions and respond with "Well of course it is right" and my response "Oh how is this so?". There is no such thing as "absolutes" when it comes to assumed authority, to believe such is to go against what it means to be human. But wait, there is a belief held that some sort of absolute law governs everything in our society! Why? Because people reinforce the belief with their actions.

 If the braincell is a mirror of the shape of the universe, is it not possible our thoughts fuel some sort of internal universe for ourselves? If thoughts send out energy and that energy is an extension of our actions, then that would therefore mean that on a cellular level, the way we interact with our environment is based on what we think. This technically means A BEING IS WHAT IT THINKS ABOUT. What information goes through the neurons is the building blocks to personality and a sort of "internal" universe. If a person is constantly living in fear or anger they are therefore a part of an angry world on the external level as well!

Experiences shape personality, is this why so many repetitive dogmas are thrown onto society today? Is this some sort of attempt getting many innocent minds into the same cruel reality? I would certainly hope not as this means that the thing running the world is not truly government or even men at all; it is pure thought.


Before I leave on this note however I must say, these are merely my own laws that I perceive within the universe in reaction to myself; by no means does your world have to follow the same, they are only meant to inspire thinking.

Part 2: Why anger solves nothing while revealing everything

Anger can be defined as a fire after a campfire has long since been extinguished. There is a very peculiar state of mind associated with rage; that being, an animalistic one. When a being becomes enraged what happens to self? Where does the concept of "self" go? It vanishes instantly without any knowledge to the being in question. "Self" is often defined as being 'personality' by the human being while self in the animal kingdom is simply "survival traits". This is not to say animals do not have a personality but they keep it separate from their "self". The R-complex or rather, the lizard mind, does not compute self when infuriated. Instead it computes "ME" not "WHAT IS ME?" but rather "ME ME ME, I *This* I *that*. The term "you" becomes non-existent in instances of anger.

How is this accomplished and why? The R-Complex is associated with survival; when a person feels anger, it is usually due to something threatening their lifestyle or at least making it uncomfortable. A train can only run so smoothly until a rock is put on its tracks to put it poetically. Therefore when some sort of assumed discomfort is brought into a beings existence either due to another or due to their NON-ACCEPTANCE of another beings choices there is brought the emotion anger. Anger can be caused by multiple things however, these are a few key ones:

 -Discomfort towards limitations put on self-survival (lack of food, resources, materialism in raw form)

-Discomfort towards injustices in other emotional endeavors (Dating, sex, so on)

 -Discomfort towards another beings personal "self" (As in, another person does something that doesn't agree with what another person has accumulated and assumed to be "true" in their own lives. Or another being does something that is viewed as "unfair" towards the selfish "ME" robot that is the R-Complex. All beings have the right to opinion and choice and to go against another being for simply doing what they believe is right would be saying that you basically wish those same rights were removed from yourself. Due to the lizard mind's inability to reason outside of "self" 99.9% of the time there is seperation from the respectful "self" which then becomes the "ME". The human "Self" acknowledges others in the same way they acknowledge others in return, but when "self" is replaced with "The Me" notion, there is a loss of self for material.

 So then anger is a result of assumed injustice based on pre-conceived opinion? In a good summary yes it is. But then why do some people get angry just "because". It is because they "believe" there is a reason to be based on past notions, and if they have no knowledge of a situation but infuriate themselves regardless it is because they refuse to believe there is anything "correct" going on when a situation becomes too vastly different for themselves to readily accomadate to. This lack of understanding is a result of a lack of personal forgiveness and thus the forgiveness of others, is also lacking.

 The best cure for the useless emotion of anger? Accept its existence as a part of human existence, but treat it like you'd treat a screaming child, with patience, tolerance, and not letting anything the "angry brain" says be taken seriously, for it is just a phase that may serve no use, it is still natural, and therefore can be adapted to.

Part 1: Basics of Emotional Interaction

A human being, by programmed nature, is capable of experiencing a variety of emotions, thoughts, and feelings towards others. One may ask "Are these things not all the same"? Indeed they are not.

Let us begin by examining how a typical person interacts with others on a daily basis. To begin with, if encountering a stranger who is NOT in the immediate path towards a desired destination there is little or no communication on any level. If however the stranger crosses paths with the person we are imagining then one of two things will have a 95% chance of happening; either the man will say "excuse me" to the stranger or the stranger will be the one to state that apology first.

Why is this? Why retain mannerisms for people we do not know? Nothing says that stranger hasn't wronged someone we know, nothing says the stranger isn't a well thinking person either. Is this the reason for mannerisms? Because the person "might" be a good person? Or is it the hope that such a person will respect us for being polite? I feel it cannot be any of these things and to believe so would make a person either completely secure or completely paranoid within their environment and I feel that neither is 100% possible for any human being.

What I do believe on this matter is that internally, there is a conflict between the physical and the emotional. When we are walking we are focusing on the physical aspects of our path but when another being crosses our path the emotional or mental (one of the two, perhaps a bit of both) intervenes to give us good sense towards this other being. This is not so much respect so much as it is responsibility on a humane level. We can have the most frustrating day of our lives but yet we still find time to apologize for intervening in the path of another and others do the same as well in return.

 There is thought, it involves thinking that all people, are possibly "good" or "bad" potentially. Thinking however also gets our attention when we need to enter a state of acknowledgement for another being; we may not readily enjoy their presence but we still accept that it must be acknowledged as it is in our immediate environment and thus possibly relevant to ourselves.

 Then we have Emotion. Emotion involves a curious "feel" for other things in our environment. This is what helps us judge whether or not a being should be treated a certain way based on external stimuli. If a person we do not know crosses our path, we feel neutral towards the person mentally but the respect we suddenly gain is a slight burst of "hopeful compassion" that is usually unnoticed as such. If this was not the case then we would probably disregard the person in our line of sight completely until we stumbled over there as if they were invisible.

 We also have feelings, feelings are the after result of the situations we face involving other beings. If a stranger apologizes for getting in our way and says "Excuse me" we usually say "You're ok, or oh its fine". Why is this? Is this just a typical response? It cannot be, the human is a being of natural compassion, so much that it is unnoticed. If a person apologizes to us for getting in our way, we feel torn and slightly upset with ourselves, perhaps embarassed for getting in the way of another even though the other clearly is apologizing for getting in our path. In turn we say "Its ok" as if we are trying to assure the person that what they are doing is not bothersome to us, just out of reflex.

 So then is this mental/emotional reflex natural? It must be for I see it almost everyday. "Excuse Me", "You're ok", "Pardon Me" "Oh don't worry", "Am I in your way?" "No don't worry, you can go ahead". See what I mean? These are not words of people that are paranoid or completely confident, these are words of beings that are carefully compassionate. Human beings respect one another so much that they cannot even see just how much they truly respect each other. Isn't that a fascinating revelation?

 Why else would such events occur daily? When people are forced into close proximity suddenly there is a need to respect thy neighbor even if both beings are complete opposites to one another. There is a need to respect in close proximity, I find this interesting given how divided people attempt to be on a daily basis. Perhaps the key to humanity understanding itself isn't to divide them individually.

Instead if human beings were put closer together towards something they all perceive as individual to themselves, and when the time comes there will be a great chorus of "Excuse me, sorry pardon me, am I in your way?" and in return there will be heard a gentle "Oh don't worry you're fine, you can go ahead first." That of course can only be followed by one more phrase that is universal, a soft spoken "Thank you".

Part 0: What is Birth?

A seed is engrained into dirt, the dirt overcomes the seed, the dirt is watered, warmed, and given air to breathe.

The seed grows and sheds roots (the limbs) outward, still encased mostly in a shell, the physical body. When cared for enough, under the right conditions, the seed developes into a mostly living entity. The roots extend into the ground and connect to the deeper frequencies of the earth. This is the plant equivelent of the human legs becoming developed and attuning to the root energy centers in the lower body; allowing prolonged physical activities and connection to nature.

The seed, now becomes a plant, the plant is still however a limited being. It may flower, it may grow beautiful even, but what good is it without the necessities that are water and light? Water is the cleansing element of renewal and is needed when connecting to the fiery light energy that burns internally during a release of life force. The sunlight that is external is also needed to help the body, the limited plant or seed (the human form) remember its origin as a being of energy.

The energy is the beginning of all life, the farthest memory distant in thought from all other thoughts. The human memory is beyond flesh it extends in biology. Just as every seed KNOWS it needs to be fed light and soil and water and air, the human mind, deep within its crevices, perhaps even unknown to the conscious 3D mind, knows that it needs connection to the external and internal faces of the cosmos.

The cosmos is the divine light, shining on all things, the water is the spirit, ever changing in a brief moment, the air is the thought and choice that leads to discovering the origin of existence within the mind, and the fire? The fire is hidden but ever present in making the body function physically.

What is birth? The result of a being uncovering not why it exists but why it exists so dynamically within the carefully constructed gardens of creation and acceptance of those conditions as a necessity. That is birth on the deepest level, birth is physical to some, but true birth does not come within the human existence until it reaches a state of self acceptance, forgiveness, and selfless bliss, combined with connection to all as opposed to the simple "I" of the 3D sapient mind.